I'm sure that many bloggers have the same problem when loading items from You Tube at the least hint of topless bodies or anything else which might suggest sex that item is taken down. It is for this reason that I have used Daily Motion for some items and even there I have found it prudent to be careful having been banned once. Many Thanks...no7shirt(femfighteurope.blogspot.co.uk)
Same to me, no7shirt, YouTube will eventually remove my topless videos (leaving alone thousands of high voltage sexual face sitting clips...). And DailyMotion is erratic: full nudies are allowed one day, a shadow of a nipple is forbidden the next. That is the life of female fighting contributors and fans...
Comment on the clip: Perfect bodies and sexy outfits! Only wish the cameraman would not focus that much on filming the women's crotch but more on the holds, expressions and action.
I agree 100% on the poor camera work ... I've complained about it for years from most producers and it is especially apparent with DWW.
I can't speak of Ultimate Surrender these days because with all the group orgy bullshit going on, I rarely even go to their site. But years ago when it was just two girls wrestling until the 'round four' part, the other wrestling companies cold have learned a lot on how to film a female wrestling match from watching some of theirs.
They rarely zoomed in on a body part but instead showed the entire bodies from different angles during the match, including from straight over head which was great. You saw all the holds being applied unlike DWW and others who seemed more concerned about getting the 'crotch shot' while the real action was going on and missed by the camera person.
Good camera work - that is, good direction, makes a lot of difference on the final result. Airlock_NL and Anonymous have a good point, but I have to remind both of you that this DWW series was born from a commission specifying lots of crotch shots.
I'm sure that many bloggers have the same problem when loading items from You Tube at the least hint of topless bodies or anything else which might suggest sex that item is taken down.
ReplyDeleteIt is for this reason that I have used Daily Motion for some items and even there I have found it prudent to be careful having been banned once.
Many Thanks...no7shirt(femfighteurope.blogspot.co.uk)
Same to me, no7shirt, YouTube will eventually remove my topless videos (leaving alone thousands of high voltage sexual face sitting clips...). And DailyMotion is erratic: full nudies are allowed one day, a shadow of a nipple is forbidden the next. That is the life of female fighting contributors and fans...
DeleteCheers
Comment on the clip: Perfect bodies and sexy outfits!
ReplyDeleteOnly wish the cameraman would not focus that much on filming the women's crotch but more on the holds, expressions and action.
Cheers,
Airlock_NL
I agree 100% on the poor camera work ... I've complained about it for years from most producers and it is especially apparent with DWW.
DeleteI can't speak of Ultimate Surrender these days because with all the group orgy bullshit going on, I rarely even go to their site. But years ago when it was just two girls wrestling until the 'round four' part, the other wrestling companies cold have learned a lot on how to film a female wrestling match from watching some of theirs.
They rarely zoomed in on a body part but instead showed the entire bodies from different angles during the match, including from straight over head which was great. You saw all the holds being applied unlike DWW and others who seemed more concerned about getting the 'crotch shot' while the real action was going on and missed by the camera person.
Good camera work - that is, good direction, makes a lot of difference on the final result. Airlock_NL and Anonymous have a good point, but I have to remind both of you that this DWW series was born from a commission specifying lots of crotch shots.
DeleteCheers